RiskPulseRequest Demo

The platform

One governed platform for financial crime compliance.

RiskPulse is a financial crime investigation platform that plans the file, gathers and validates the evidence, runs the client interaction, and delivers a result an examiner can read. It works with your existing monitoring, screening and case-management systems — every step configured by your policy and adjudicated by your people.

RiskPulse platform diagram showing data sources flowing into a governed case record

The compliance program

Revenue at one end.
Disproportionate effort
at the other.

Onboarding sits at the revenue end, while investigation sits at the cost end, of the financial crime compliance value chain — between them is the monitoring system you have already spent years and budget tuning. We leave that alone, accelerate one end, and compress the other.

The compliance program: onboarding and investigations run by RiskPulse either side of the transaction monitoring system you already own, wrapped by governance and quality assurance

Input

We do not replace
your monitoring.

Most institutions have spent years tuning a transaction monitoring system. RiskPulse is deliberately agnostic to it — the agents take the alert it raises and investigate from there, returning the dispositioned case to the system your team already works in.

Work arrives from where it already lives.

  • Monitoring alerts — from your existing transaction monitoring system, whatever it is
  • Onboarding requests — new relationships (CRM), periodic reviews, and event-driven triggers
  • Referrals — audit findings, whistleblower reports, and management escalations
  • Connected sources — screening and registry data, adverse registry data, adverse media, and the document, mail and collaboration systems you authorise
  • Your case management — RiskPulse's native case view, or your existing system...
RiskPulse data ingestion view

How it runs

Plan. Examine. Report.

Three coordinated agents, and each answers for its own work. A reviewer can interrogate the plan, the evidence, and the conclusion independently — accept, amend, or reject each without disturbing the rest.

The Plan, Examine, Report investigation lifecycle, with the configuration layer that changes by use case

Configuration

Your policy
is the program.

Every case carries a domain and a category. Together they select a policy — and that policy configures what the agents do, what they may touch, how the risk is scored, and what the finished report looks like. Nothing runs on a generic definition of good practice.

Domain and category select a case policy, which configures the plan template, risk dimensions, tool access and report template
Plan template
Each use case has its own plan template. The Plan Agent works from it, tuning the task list to the facts of the specific case rather than generating a plan from scratch.
Risk dimensions
The dimensions scored, their weights, the composite bands, and the override rules that force an outcome regardless of score — all defined by you, per case type.
Tool access
Which systems each agent may reach is a policy setting, not an installation default. An agent working a screening alert has the screening and registry sources that case requires and nothing else — scoped per case type, enforced at the platform, and recorded in the audit trail alongside every other action.
Report template
You define the sections, the order, the house style, and the fields. The Report Agent writes into your template, not a generic summary format.
Review gates
Where a person must intervene is configurable. A low-risk file can run through to sign-off; a higher-risk case type can require review at every stage.

The same engine, different policy

One structure.
Different questions.

This is why a single platform can run a name screening disposition and an institutional onboarding file. The scoring structure never changes — weighted dimensions, a composite band, override rules. What changes is which dimensions are being scored, and that is yours to define.

Three case types share one scoring structure but use entirely different risk dimensionsALERT INVESTIGATIONParty riskTransaction riskJurisdiction riskBusiness contextAlert riskMERCHANT FRAUDMerchant riskTransaction riskControl riskCollusion riskDocumentation riskINSTITUTIONAL ONBOARDINGSanctions and PEPBeneficial ownershipManager regulatorySource of capitalOperational conductSame structure throughout — weighted score, composite band, override rules. The dimensions themselves are policy.

Output

A defensible record,
not a summary.

Findings, actions and outputs are assembled into a complete case record. Every conclusion carries its reasoning chain and a citation to the source document, so the file can be re-read, questioned, and defended long after the analyst who closed it has moved on.

  • Scored determination — each dimension rated and weighted, with the composite band and the rule that drove the outcome
  • Written rationale — why the conclusion was reached, in your template and house style
  • Supporting evidence — every finding tied to the document, record or screening result behind it
  • Assessment limits — what could not be established, and why, stated rather than glossed over
  • Complete audit trail — agent actions, human overrides and approvals, in sequence
RiskPulse assembled case record screenshot

Governance and quality

Built to be
defended.

Two separate controls sit around the work: governance, which makes each case explainable after the fact, and quality assurance, which ensures that the final result is of the highest quality.

Governance

Explainable per case

Every case carries its full reasoning chain and source citations. What the agent did, what a person changed, and who approved it — recorded in sequence and reconstructable on demand.

Quality control

Sampling methodology

A sampling methodology is built into every case type, so your quality team can draw and assess a representative sample rather than reviewing at random or reviewing everything.

Quality assurance

Independent case assessment

A separate set of agents assesses case quality end to end against your methodology — a second opinion on the work, not a second run of it.

Technology and architecture

Your tenancy.
Your keys.

RiskPulse is a containerized, cloud-native platform that deploys into an isolated tenancy. It is designed to comply with your security standards.

  • Tenant isolation — a dedicated environment per institution, with no shared processing of your data
  • No public ingress required — access over private connectivity from your own network
  • Your encryption keys — data at rest encrypted under keys you create, own and can revoke
  • Role-based access control — investigator, reviewer and administrator roles, with segregation of duties enforced
  • Controlled egress — outbound access restricted to the external sources you approve
  • Portable — the environment can be migrated into your own cloud account and operated under your own governance at any point
Users reach an isolated tenancy over private connectivity, with controlled outbound access to approved external sourcesYour networkInvestigatorsReviewers, adminsISOLATED TENANCYEdgeNo public ingress requiredApplicationRole-based access controlData and modelsEncrypted under your keysApproved externalsourcesControlled egress only

What is RiskPulse platform

Nine configurations.
One governed platform.

Each is the same engine under a different policy. Our platform is capable of addressing financial crime compliance and corporate fraud use cases.

Screening

Name Screening & Sanctions

Dispositions sanctions, PEP, and adverse media alerts with a reasoned rationale for each — semantic matching rather than fuzzy-string guesswork.

Explore Name Screening & Sanctions
Onboarding

Capital Markets Onboarding

Handles the fund, SMA, LP, and SPV structures behind a single mandate — each entity, domicile, and product scope treated as its own file.

Explore Capital Markets Onboarding
Onboarding

Commercial Banking Onboarding

Verifies documents, maps ownership to the ultimate beneficial owner, scores risk against your policy, and runs the enhanced due diligence depth your CDD model requires.

Explore Commercial Banking Onboarding
Screening

Payment Screening

Sanctions, PEP, and adverse media hits tested semantically against the alert — entity type, jurisdiction, and identifying detail — with a written rationale for each disposition.

Explore Payment Screening
Investigations

Correspondent Banking

Reviews respondent relationships, nested activity, and payment flows. Builds the periodic review file and evidences the risk position.

Explore Correspondent Banking
Investigations

Trade-Based Money Laundering

Reads trade documents, tests pricing against benchmarks, checks vessel and route consistency, and screens every counterparty in the chain.

Explore Trade-Based Money Laundering
Investigations

Merchant Fraud

Merchant, chargeback, and account-level fraud patterns assessed against control, collusion, and documentation indicators — investigated on the same engine under its own policy.

Explore Merchant Fraud
Investigations

Vendor Fraud

Invoice manipulation, shell vendors, and payment diversion schemes scoped from the allegation — ownership traced, transactions reconstructed, and the finding written against your policy.

Explore Vendor Fraud
Investigations

Corporate Fraud

Collects transactional and behavioral data, traces the flow of funds across accounts, and produces an investigator-ready case file with the narrative drafted.

Explore Corporate Fraud

See it on your own file

Bring a real case.
We’ll show you the workflow.

Pick a real file or a closed case and see how RiskPulse plans it, evidences it, and writes it up under your policy.

Request Demo