Full reasoning chain
Every conclusion carries its reasoning and a citation to the source document, with agent actions and human overrides recorded in sequence.
Solution · Onboarding
Commercial banking onboarding software that identifies what the business is, determines the KYC/CDD/BO/EDD requirements, gathers and validates the evidence, and gives onboarding and Financial Crimes a complete package for review.
The work
Onboarding delay is rarely analysis. It is the loop of asking a client for documents, chasing them, and re-keying what arrives. RiskPulse runs that loop as part of the case.
Determine whether the entity already exists, what type of business it actually is, its jurisdiction, products requested, and relevant related parties.
Apply the bank's policy to identify required CDD, BO, EDD, product-specific and supporting documentation.
Reuse existing documents, retrieve available external information, request what is missing, classify documents, extract data and validate completeness.
Validate entity information, ownership, registrations, licenses, screening, high-risk client requirements and applicable EDD activities.
Present gaps, blockers, evidence and completed requirements to onboarding / Financial Crimes for human review and approval.
Where the agents run
The same three agents run this case type as run every other. What differs is the policy behind them — the plan template, the dimensions scored, the tools available, and the report that comes out.
RiskPulse determines what is required for the client and product before the onboarding process progresses. It automatically completes what it can from available data and approved sources, identifies what must come from the client, and prevents only those downstream activities that depend on missing mandatory evidence.
Policy for this case type
Nothing on this page is fixed in the product. Every element below is a policy setting you define, which is why the same platform runs this case type and the four others.
Controls
The same governance and quality controls apply to this case type as to every other — because an examiner does not lower the standard for the harder files.
Every conclusion carries its reasoning and a citation to the source document, with agent actions and human overrides recorded in sequence.
A sampling methodology sits behind this case type, so your quality team can assess a representative sample rather than reviewing at random.
A separate set of agents assesses case quality end to end against your methodology — a second opinion on the work.
See it on your own file
Pick a real file or a closed case and see how RiskPulse plans it, evidences it, and writes it up under your policy.
Request Demo